T4T Macro IFVG — Execution Log
| Account | Executor | Market | Open | Today | Balance | P&L since 18:00 NY | Last signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nas2m gc2m ym5m es5m nq3m Vantage demo | LIVE beat 105s ago (every 5m) | OPEN 14:50–15:10 NY (es5m) closed · 1m signal tail · next 21:50–22:10 NY in 6h 11m | ym5m: short 1.6 DJ30 · nq3m: long 7.7 NAS100 | 5 signals · 5 traded caps per setup below | 99,174.94 | +85.72 -226.79 banked + costs · +312.51 still open | 2h ago |
2 positions open right now
Entry and stop are the broker's own figures; the current price is what it quoted at the last heartbeat. ⭐ This section appears only while something is open.
⚠ Up to 5 minutes old — it rides the heartbeat rather than costing a write of its own, so the price has moved since. The stop shown is the one the broker holds, and that is what will actually execute.
Every alert at a glance
One row per live alert. ⚠ Each row is its own configuration: results are never added across rows, and R is the figure to compare — risk per trade differs between setups, so dollars do not.
| Setup | Schedule | Open | Today | Closed | Net R | Net $ | Last signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| es5m VANTAGE:SP500 · 5m last: final target hit · +236.98 · +0.48R · 7h ago | 14:50 closed · 1m tail alert 57d left | flat | 1/5 | 2 · 2W 0L | +0.77R avg +0.38R | +378 | 7h ago |
| gc2m VANTAGE:XAUUSD · 2m last: closed at end of day after TP2 · +667.80 · +1.38R · 23h ago | next 19:50 in 4h 11m alert 57d left | flat | 0/5 | 4 · 2W 2L | +1.15R avg +0.29R | +565 | 23h ago |
| nas2m VANTAGE:NAS100 · 2m last: stop hit, after taking a target · -319.17 · -0.64R · 13h ago | next 23:50 in 8h 11m alert 57d left | flat | 1/4 | 9 · 2W 7L | -4.14R avg -0.46R | -2,033 | 13h ago |
| nq3m VANTAGE:NAS100 · 3m last: stop hit, after taking a target · -144.60 · -0.29R · 13h ago | next 23:50 in 8h 11m alert 57d left | long 7.7 NAS100 | 2/4 | 4 · 2W 2L | +1.80R avg +0.45R | +857 | 2h ago |
| ym5m VANTAGE:DJ30 · 5m last: scratched at breakeven after TP2 · +401.80 · +0.85R · 1d ago | next 18:50 in 3h 11m alert 57d left | short 1.6 DJ30 | 1/4 | 1 · 1W 0L | +0.85R avg +0.85R | +402 | 5h ago |
Earlier settings, and what they produced
⭐ Kept because the trades are evidence about that configuration. ⚠ They are not pooled with the live figures — comparing two different strategies as one sample would say nothing true about either. Gold 2-minute (FTMO demo) · Gold 2-minute · Nasdaq 3-minute
Notes on the strategy, from running it →
⭐ What running this on live accounts has made visible that a backtest cannot show — the division of labour between the strategy and the executor, what we measured, the gaps, and the design questions that belong to the author rather than to us. ⛔ Including the four changes we expected to help, measured, and dropped.
KV writes today — 880 of 1,000
The relay runs on a free tier capped at 1,000 writes a day, and ⛔ nothing would announce running out — writes would simply start failing while the relay kept answering and this page kept rendering the last good record. ⭐ So the figure is derived rather than counted: a counter would itself cost a write every time it moved.
| Source | Writes/day | Scales with |
|---|---|---|
| Heartbeats | 864 | ⚠ executors, not instruments — another instrument on an existing account costs nothing here |
| Trade reports | 16 | trades × ~5 legs each |
| Events | 0 | plans, and ⚠ a refusal costs two |
| Projected total | 880 (88%) | at today's rate, 82% of the day elapsed |
⭐ One more executor would add 288 writes a day before it placed a single trade — that, not more trading, is what would breach this. The durable record already lives in a database; this budget only governs the relay's own working store.
Deadlines and gaps
- nothing outstanding